Content
The Dawn of Seaside Modesty
Before the 19th century, dedicated beach holidays weren’t widespread. When people did venture into the water, practices varied. Often, particularly in segregated areas, swimming was done nude. If clothing was worn, it was typically everyday undergarments or shifts, certainly not designed for aquatic activity and becoming incredibly heavy and cumbersome when wet. The idea wasn’t performance or style, but simply getting into the water without causing a public scandal. The Victorian era, with its burgeoning middle class and the rise of railway travel, saw seaside resorts boom in popularity. This created a new social dilemma: how does one maintain strict societal standards of propriety while engaging in the rather undignified act of getting wet in public? The answer was the first generation of “bathing costumes,” garments designed expressly for concealing the body at the water’s edge.Wool, Weights, and Wheeled Huts
For women, these early bathing costumes were astonishingly cumbersome. Imagine outfits constructed primarily from heavy flannel or serge wool – fabrics chosen because they wouldn’t become transparent when wet, but which absorbed vast amounts of water. A typical ensemble included a knee-length, loose-fitting dress, often with a sailor collar and long sleeves, worn over voluminous bloomers or trousers that reached the ankles. Dark stockings and lace-up bathing shoes completed the look. Some outfits even had weights sewn into the hems to prevent the skirts from floating up and revealing the legs. Men’s attire was slightly less restrictive but still aimed squarely at coverage. Long, often one-piece suits made of wool, resembling long underwear, covered the torso and extended down to the knees or mid-calf. Stripes were a popular pattern. The primary goal for both sexes was clear: prevent any hint of the naked form from being seen, even by members of the same gender in designated bathing areas. Adding to the elaborate efforts to maintain decorum were bathing machines. These were small, wheeled wooden huts rolled directly into the water. Bathers would change inside the hut, descend steps directly into the sea away from prying eyes on the shore, take a brief dip, and re-enter the machine to change back, all without ever being seen in their bathing costume on the open beach. It was modesty taken to an almost logistical extreme.Cracks in the Fabric: The Early 20th Century
The turn of the century saw slight modifications, but the principle of coverage remained paramount. Sleeves might shorten slightly, bloomers might become a bit less voluminous, but the heavy fabrics and overall concealing silhouette persisted. Swimming, as an athletic activity, was still secondary to the social performance of “taking the waters.” A significant figure challenging these norms was Australian swimmer Annette Kellerman. An advocate for women’s health and fitness, she found the traditional bathing costumes dangerously impractical for actual swimming. Around 1907, she adopted a more form-fitting, one-piece suit that resembled men’s styles, ending above the knee and lacking sleeves. While tame by modern standards, this was radical. Her appearances in such attire, particularly in the United States, led to her arrest for indecency on Revere Beach, Massachusetts.Important Information: Early 20th-century beach regulations were incredibly strict regarding swimwear modesty. Beach patrols often measured the length of women’s suits, ensuring skirts weren’t too far above the knee. Violators, like Annette Kellerman, faced fines or even arrest for challenging these rigid codes of public decency.Kellerman’s defiance, however controversial, planted a seed. It highlighted the conflict between restrictive fashion and functional needs. While widespread change was slow, her actions contributed to the gradual acceptance of slightly less cumbersome swimwear, particularly as swimming gained popularity as a genuine sport and recreational activity, not just a brief, modest dip.
The Roaring Twenties and Tentative Exposure
The social shifts following World War I brought a new sense of freedom and modernity, which slowly began to reflect in beachwear. The heavy wools started giving way to slightly lighter materials, though cotton and jersey knit were common. For women, hemlines crept up towards the knee, sleeves often disappeared entirely, and the cumbersome bloomers evolved into attached shorts or simpler trunks beneath a tunic top. Stockings were increasingly abandoned. However, modesty police still patrolled the beaches, ruler in hand, enforcing regulations on suit length. Showing too much leg remained taboo. Men’s suits also evolved, with the top portion sometimes becoming more like a tank top attached to knee-length shorts, though the one-piece style remained prevalent. A major shift was the burgeoning fashion for sun tanning. Previously associated with outdoor labor, a tan began to signify leisure and health, encouraging designs that allowed for a little more sun exposure, albeit cautiously.New Materials and Two Pieces: The 1930s and 40s
Technological innovation played a key role in the next evolution. The development of elastic yarns like Lastex in the 1930s allowed for fabrics that could stretch and cling, leading to more form-fitting designs for both men and women. This enhanced comfort and movement in the water. Women’s swimwear saw the tentative introduction of the two-piece suit. Crucially, these early two-pieces bore little resemblance to the modern bikini. They typically consisted of a structured, full-coverage top and high-waisted bottoms that covered the navel entirely, leaving only a sliver of midriff exposed. Necklines might become lower (like the popular sweetheart style), and back exposure increased, but significant coverage was still the norm. For men, the major change was the increasing acceptance of going shirtless. Separate trunks, resembling shorts, became common, although the one-piece tank suit held on for some time. This shift reflected a growing comfort with displaying the male torso.The Bikini Boom and Beyond
The post-World War II era witnessed the most dramatic shift in swimwear history: the invention of the bikini. In 1946, two French designers, Louis Réard and Jacques Heim, simultaneously unveiled competing minimalist two-piece designs. Heim called his the ‘Atome’ (smallest particle), while Réard, referencing the atomic bomb testing at Bikini Atoll, chose the name ‘Bikini,’ claiming his design was even smaller and more explosive. Réard’s design, famously modeled by Micheline Bernardini because no mainstream model would wear it, was scandalous. Consisting of just four small triangles of fabric held together by string, it revealed the navel – a major taboo at the time. Initial reactions ranged from shock and outrage to fascination. The Vatican declared it sinful, and it was banned on many beaches, particularly in the US and conservative parts of Europe. Its adoption was slow, often confined to the French Riviera and movie starlets seeking publicity. While the bikini grabbed headlines, the one-piece swimsuit remained the standard for most women through the 1950s and early 60s. These suits, however, benefited from new materials and construction techniques, featuring built-in bras, boning, and ruching to create the fashionable hourglass silhouette of the era. They became more glamorous, yet still relatively modest compared to the bikini.Verified Information: The modern bikini was introduced in 1946 by French designers Louis Réard and Jacques Heim. Réard’s version, named after the Bikini Atoll nuclear tests, was particularly shocking for its time due to its minimal coverage and exposure of the navel. Its initial reception was controversial, leading to bans in several countries and regions.
